Four Singaporean men, including three former employees of SMRT Trains, have been handed jail sentences of varying lengths after being convicted of a conspiracy to cheat their employer out of more than S$4 million (US$3 million) through a sophisticated scheme involving shell companies and rigged contracts.
The complex, long-running trial concluded on Wednesday, November 12, with all four men receiving custodial sentences. District Judge Eddy Tham presided over the sentencing, emphasizing the "grave breach of trust" and the serious implications for SMRT, a key provider of vital public transport services.
The Conspirators and Sentences
| Individual | Age | Former Role at SMRT | Sentence | Culpability |
| Jamalludin Jumari | 68 | Section Manager, Permanent Way Branch | 4 years, 9 months | Highest (Initiator) |
| Zakaria Mohamed Shariff | 67 | Assistant Engineer, Permanent Way Branch | 4 years, 9 months | High (Accomplice/Controller) |
| Zulkifli Marwi | 60 | Line Manager, Permanent Way Branch | 26 months | Lower (Endorser/Concealer) |
| Akbar Ali Tambishahib | 68 | None (Figurehead Director) | 26 months | Lower (Frontman) |
Jamalludin Jumari and Zakaria Mohamed Shariff, the two highest-ranking co-conspirators who initiated the scheme, received the stiffest penalties. Zulkifli Marwi and Akbar Ali Tambishahib received shorter terms due to their lower level of culpability. Except for Zulkifli, the other three men have indicated their intention to lodge appeals against their sentences.
The Scheme to Cheat SMRT
The scheme originated with Jamalludin, the Section Manager, and Zakaria, an Assistant Engineer, both of the Permanent Way Branch, which was responsible for maintaining SMRT railway tracks.
Concealment: The duo decided to use their insider knowledge to bid for contracts to supply goods and services to SMRT. Knowing they were required to declare any business interest and fearing they would be dismissed or excluded, they conspired to conceal their involvement.
Front Companies: They enlisted Akbar Ali Tambishahib, Zakaria's childhood friend with no experience in trackworks, to act as the figurehead director for their company, Enovation Industries, and a second one, Enovation Technologies. Akbar was found to be "nothing more than a front," while Jamalludin and Zakaria controlled the operations.
Insider Aid: They later roped in Zulkifli Marwi, a Line Manager who reported to Jamalludin, to help the operation internally. Zulkifli assisted by accessing confidential information to aid their bids and acted as the first-level endorser for many of the Enovation companies' requests for quotations (RFQs).
Over a period of four-and-a-half years (2007 to 2012), SMRT awarded 26 RFQs and two tenders to the Enovation companies. The goods involved included roller package parts, wrenches, track trolleys, and hydraulic jacks. The total amount cheated from SMRT and the wrongful gain made by Enovation across these 28 transactions exceeded S$4 million. In one instance, the men reportedly planned a profit margin exceeding 400 per cent.
The S$3 Million Timber Tender
The most significant contract won was a 2011 tender for the supply, delivery, and handling of 12,000 Kempas timber sleepers to replace deteriorating ones, valued at S$3.7 million. Enovation submitted the lowest compliant bid and won.
The prosecution noted that Zulkifli was also responsible for the quality control checks for these sleepers. SMRT later discovered that the supplied timber sleepers did not meet the required specifications, leading SMRT to terminate the contract and later uncover the massive conflict of interest.
Judge Tham emphasized that the three SMRT employees exploited the confidential information and experience they had acquired, undermining the integrity of SMRT's internal approval system. He stressed the importance of strict adherence to policies, noting that rail service disruptions due to faulty components severely affect daily commuters.
The judge also rejected a plea for judicial mercy for Zulkifli, who had suffered a stroke, stating that the degree of hardship did not reach the level where imprisonment would endanger his life.

Comments
Post a Comment