Skip to main content


The Singapore Police arrested two men, aged 25 and 26, for suspected involvement in loanshark harassment cases. 

The first case, reported on September 24, involved a residential unit at Bedok Reservoir Road where red paint was splashed on the door, and a debtor’s note was left. The 26-year-old suspect was arrested on September 27 and linked to another harassment case at Bedok North Avenue 3. 

In the second case, reported on September 27 at Sims Drive, a 25-year-old suspect was arrested after splashing brown paint and leaving a debtor's note. 

Both men face charges under the Moneylenders Act 2008, with first-time offenders potentially facing fines, imprisonment, and caning. 

The Police urge the public to avoid involvement with loansharks and report any suspected activity.





Labels:
Location: Singapore

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Vulgar Taxi Driver Argues With Passenger Over Fare

  A video documenting a heated dispute between a taxi driver and his passengers has circulated widely online, sparking significant discussion about service standards and passenger rights. The incident began when the passengers, a man in the front seat and a woman in the back, reached their destination and questioned an unexplained charge on the fare meter. The core of the argument centered on an additional amount listed under the "EXTRA" category on the taxi's payment display. The male passenger sought a clear explanation for this surcharge, suggesting that imposing unaccounted fees could potentially lead to repercussions for the driver's vocational license. The driver, in his defense, stated that since he had not yet collected the payment, he had not actually received the money and therefore could not be accused of overcharging at that point in time. The situation escalated rapidly when the driver proposed going to a police station to settle the matter. When the male...
Post a Comment
Read more

Viral Police Report Accuses Tan Tock Seng Hospital of Unlawful Restraint

  A serious allegation against Tan Tock Seng Hospital has emerged online through a viral social media post by Olivia Tang on October 19th, 2025. The post contained an image of a formal police report filed regarding an incident that allegedly occurred at the hospital on October 10th, 2025. According to the police report shared by Tang, the situation unfolded when she was reportedly subjected to what she describes as a forcible medical procedure one day before her scheduled discharge from the hospital. She alleges that a doctor directed approximately ten hospital staff members and AETOS security officers to physically restrain her. In her account, her hospital gown was torn open, and she was administered an injection containing an unknown substance without her explicit consent. The justification provided for this action, according to Tang's police report, was that she was deemed to be of unsound mind under the Mental Health Act. This classification allegedly resulted in her being den...
Post a Comment
Read more

Marine Terrace Feud Turns Physical in New Video

  The ongoing neighbor dispute at Block 53 Marine Terrace has escalated further with the release of new video footage on October 18th. Madam Poh shared the visual evidence showing a physical confrontation with her neighbors, accompanied by a caption alleging violent behavior following their recent court case loss. The video footage, which lacks audio content, depicts a couple who are Madam Poh's neighbors engaged in what appears to be a tense argument with the individuals recording. In the sequence of events, the female neighbor is seen retreating toward their residence while the male neighbor advances toward Madam Poh and the camera operator. The situation intensifies as the man confronts them directly before striking the recording device, causing it to fall to the ground. This incident occurs in the context of the recent legal ruling from the Community Disputes Resolution Tribunals, which found in favor of Madam Poh and her family. The court had ordered the neighbors to pay $345 ...
Post a Comment
Read more