Skip to main content

Lee Hsien Yang Pays Over $600,000 to Ministers Shanmugam and Balakrishnan for Defamation

 


Lee Hsien Yang was ordered to pay $619,335.53 to Home Affairs Minister K. Shanmugam and Foreign Minister Vivian Balakrishnan after being sued for defamation. The High Court ruled against him in November 2023, after he failed to respond or appear in court, and awarded the ministers $200,000 each in damages, plus $50,000 in aggravated damages. The court noted that Lee acted with malice, knowing his statements were false. His defamatory claims were made in a Facebook post, accusing the ministers of receiving preferential treatment in renting Ridout Road bungalows.

Description of the Ridout Saga

The controversy around Ridout Road began when it became known that Shanmugam and Balakrishnan were leasing state-owned black-and-white colonial bungalows. Public concerns arose over possible conflicts of interest, given that Shanmugam heads the Ministry of Law, which oversees the Singapore Land Authority (SLA), the body responsible for leasing the properties. An investigation by the Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau (CPIB) and a review by Senior Minister Teo Chee Hean cleared both ministers of any wrongdoing. However, concerns about perceived conflict of interest and inequality continued to be discussed. A six-hour parliamentary debate followed, addressing accountability, public perception, and fairness in such matters.

Lee Hsien Yang’s Reply to the Payment

Lee Hsien Yang, in his September 2024 Facebook post, explained that he paid the ministers the damages to honor his father Lee Kuan Yew's wishes concerning the family home at 38 Oxley Road, which he referred to as his "significant asset" in Singapore. He claimed the payment was necessary to allow his sister, Dr. Lee Wei Ling, to continue living in the house due to her illness. The ministers, however, rejected this connection, emphasizing that the defamation case had no relation to 38 Oxley Road, and reiterated that the damages would be donated to charity. They also pointed out that Lee had other assets in Singapore that could have settled the debt if needed.


The six-hour parliamentary debate on the Ridout Road saga, which took place in July 2023, did not lead to a formal legal verdict but rather served as a forum to address public concerns and provide transparency on the matter. During the debate, Senior Minister Teo Chee Hean presented findings from an investigation by the Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau (CPIB), which cleared both Home Affairs Minister K. Shanmugam and Foreign Minister Vivian Balakrishnan of any wrongdoing or preferential treatment in their rental of the state-owned Ridout Road bungalows.

The key conclusions from the debate were:

  1. No Corruption or Wrongdoing: The CPIB found no evidence of corruption, criminal wrongdoing, or conflict of interest in the rental transactions.
  2. Ministers' Conduct: Both ministers had acted appropriately and taken steps to avoid any conflict of interest. For instance, Shanmugam had recused himself from the decision-making process related to the properties.
  3. Public Perception: While the legal investigations cleared the ministers, much of the debate centered on the importance of public perception, accountability, and transparency in governance.

Although there was no formal legal verdict, the debate reaffirmed that the ministers had acted properly according to the laws and ethical guidelines, though it highlighted the need for enhanced procedures to address potential conflicts of interest in the future.




Labels:
Location: Singapore

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Singapore NSF Found Unconscious at Pasir Laba Camp, Pronounced Dead in Hospital

  A full-time national serviceman (NSF) from the Singapore Armed Forces (SAF) was found unconscious and unresponsive at Pasir Laba Camp on Friday evening.  The Ministry of Defence (MINDEF) and Singapore Police Force (SPF) confirmed that the NSF was evacuated to Ng Teng Fong General Hospital by the SAF Ambulance Service but was pronounced dead despite resuscitation efforts.  MINDEF and SPF clarified that the incident is not training-related, and preliminary investigations do not suggest foul play.  The case has been classified as an unnatural death, with investigations ongoing. MINDEF and the SAF expressed their condolences to the serviceman's family and are providing support during this time of grief. Rest in Peace.
Post a Comment
Read more

Marine Terrace Feud Turns Physical in New Video

  The ongoing neighbor dispute at Block 53 Marine Terrace has escalated further with the release of new video footage on October 18th. Madam Poh shared the visual evidence showing a physical confrontation with her neighbors, accompanied by a caption alleging violent behavior following their recent court case loss. The video footage, which lacks audio content, depicts a couple who are Madam Poh's neighbors engaged in what appears to be a tense argument with the individuals recording. In the sequence of events, the female neighbor is seen retreating toward their residence while the male neighbor advances toward Madam Poh and the camera operator. The situation intensifies as the man confronts them directly before striking the recording device, causing it to fall to the ground. This incident occurs in the context of the recent legal ruling from the Community Disputes Resolution Tribunals, which found in favor of Madam Poh and her family. The court had ordered the neighbors to pay $345 ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Nightmare Passenger Pukes and WON'T Compensate!

  A video featuring a sharp disagreement between a private hire vehicle driver and his passengers has become a widely viewed topic on social media, prompting a significant discussion about passenger accountability and operational costs for drivers. The recording shows a couple who appear to be intoxicated involved in a dispute with the driver over an incident that occurred during their trip. The driver states that one of the passengers became sick inside his vehicle, creating a mess that required professional cleaning. Following the completion of the journey, the driver requested a payment of one hundred and fifty dollars from the couple to cover the cleaning fee. The couple immediately rejected this demand. They argued that the amount was ridiculous and unreasonably high for the situation. The driver stood his ground, leading to a tense exchange that was captured in the video. The conflict reached a new level when the passengers declared their intention to file a formal report wit...
Post a Comment
Read more