Skip to main content

WP Pritam Singh on Trial - Can Raeesah Khan be Trusted?


On Tuesday (Oct 15), Pritam Singh's defense team began cross-examining former Workers' Party (WP) member Raeesah Khan, with Singh's lawyer, Andre Jumabhoy, accusing her of consistently lying, both in Parliament and to Singh personally. This cross-examination follows Khan’s infamous false anecdote made in Parliament on August 3, 2021, where she falsely claimed to have accompanied a rape victim to the police station, alleging inappropriate comments made by a police officer.

Khan's admission that the story was a fabrication triggered a series of events, eventually leading to a Committee of Privileges (COP) inquiry. Singh, the WP's secretary-general, is now facing two charges for allegedly lying to the COP about the timeline of events and his involvement in addressing Khan’s falsehood.

During the cross-examination, Jumabhoy pressed Khan on her pattern of deception, labeling her a “liar” multiple times. Khan, while admitting to lying in Parliament, denied lying "non-stop." She conceded that her account of escorting women to the police station was entirely false, including details such as the victim's age and her emotional state.

Jumabhoy also highlighted how Khan continued lying to Singh after her false anecdote. He pointed out that Khan invented additional details to support her lie, such as claiming she could not contact the survivor when, in reality, she didn’t even know the victim. Jumabhoy asserted that these "lies upon lies" demonstrated Khan’s capacity for deceit. Khan responded, stating that her actions stemmed from fear and the pressure she felt not to disappoint Singh, whom she admired.

The cross-examination revealed that Khan continued to build on her fabrications, even while maintaining her respect for Singh, whom she described as a mentor. She admitted to lying not just to Singh but to the entire country when she made the false claims in Parliament.

The critical question now is whether the judge should believe Raeesah Khan’s testimony, given her repeated history of lies. After admitting to fabricating key elements of her story in Parliament and lying to Pritam Singh himself, her credibility is under intense scrutiny. Can her account be trusted when her past behavior has shown a pattern of deception? This raises doubts about the reliability of her testimony, leaving the court to weigh whether her version of events is trustworthy to begin with.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Singapore NSF Found Unconscious at Pasir Laba Camp, Pronounced Dead in Hospital

  A full-time national serviceman (NSF) from the Singapore Armed Forces (SAF) was found unconscious and unresponsive at Pasir Laba Camp on Friday evening.  The Ministry of Defence (MINDEF) and Singapore Police Force (SPF) confirmed that the NSF was evacuated to Ng Teng Fong General Hospital by the SAF Ambulance Service but was pronounced dead despite resuscitation efforts.  MINDEF and SPF clarified that the incident is not training-related, and preliminary investigations do not suggest foul play.  The case has been classified as an unnatural death, with investigations ongoing. MINDEF and the SAF expressed their condolences to the serviceman's family and are providing support during this time of grief. Rest in Peace.

Marine Terrace Feud Turns Physical in New Video

  The ongoing neighbor dispute at Block 53 Marine Terrace has escalated further with the release of new video footage on October 18th. Madam Poh shared the visual evidence showing a physical confrontation with her neighbors, accompanied by a caption alleging violent behavior following their recent court case loss. The video footage, which lacks audio content, depicts a couple who are Madam Poh's neighbors engaged in what appears to be a tense argument with the individuals recording. In the sequence of events, the female neighbor is seen retreating toward their residence while the male neighbor advances toward Madam Poh and the camera operator. The situation intensifies as the man confronts them directly before striking the recording device, causing it to fall to the ground. This incident occurs in the context of the recent legal ruling from the Community Disputes Resolution Tribunals, which found in favor of Madam Poh and her family. The court had ordered the neighbors to pay $345 ...

Nightmare Passenger Pukes and WON'T Compensate!

  A video featuring a sharp disagreement between a private hire vehicle driver and his passengers has become a widely viewed topic on social media, prompting a significant discussion about passenger accountability and operational costs for drivers. The recording shows a couple who appear to be intoxicated involved in a dispute with the driver over an incident that occurred during their trip. The driver states that one of the passengers became sick inside his vehicle, creating a mess that required professional cleaning. Following the completion of the journey, the driver requested a payment of one hundred and fifty dollars from the couple to cover the cleaning fee. The couple immediately rejected this demand. They argued that the amount was ridiculous and unreasonably high for the situation. The driver stood his ground, leading to a tense exchange that was captured in the video. The conflict reached a new level when the passengers declared their intention to file a formal report wit...