WP Pritam Singh on Trial Part 8 - Ex WP Admits Urging Raeesah Khan to Lie in Trail

On October 21, former Workers’ Party (WP) member Yudhishthra Nathan testified against WP leader Pritam Singh in a trial centered around allegations that Singh misled the Committee of Privileges (COP) regarding a lie told by former WP MP Raeesah Khan in parliament. Nathan, who left the party in 2022 after six years, admitted under cross-examination that he had considered encouraging Khan to maintain her false statement due to the party’s lack of a clear plan for her to come clean.

Khan had falsely claimed in parliament on August 3, 2021, that she accompanied a rape survivor to a police station where the police questioned the victim's attire and alcohol consumption. Although Singh and WP chair Sylvia Lim told her to tell the truth in a meeting on October 12, 2021, Khan only admitted the lie on November 1, 2021, and revealed that she herself was a survivor of sexual assault.

During cross-examination by Singh’s lawyer, Andre Jumabhoy, Nathan acknowledged he was initially in favor of having Khan lie further due to the party's failure to develop a proper plan for addressing the issue. Nathan said he vacillated between wanting Khan to maintain the lie and waiting for WP leaders to devise a solution.

Nathan also testified about a meeting on August 10, 2021, where he claimed Singh made an offensive remark regarding conservative religious men and their views on having an MP who had been raped. Singh’s lawyer accused Nathan of fabricating the comment, pointing out its absence in his previous account to the COP, but Nathan stood by his statement.

Singh faces charges for allegedly lying to the COP about the instructions given to Khan concerning her false statements in parliament.

Comments

Elderly Coffee Shop Patron Suffers Severe Back Pain Following Altercation

Update: Police have identified a forty-year-old man involved in an incident on August 15 2026 at Roxy Square food court along East Coast Road. Investigations were launched after a seventy-three-year-old man, identified as wonton noodle stall owner Yeo Song Khoon, was shoved to the ground. Mr Yeo, who has difficulty walking, had patted a young girl on the head because he found her adorable. The child's father became upset and confronted him, resulting in the fall. CCTV footage shared online by Bei-Ing Wanton Noodle showed the shove and sparked public appeals. Although the father later apologized and bought Mr Yeo a drink, Mr Yeo began experiencing back pain hours later and is currently managing it with medication. Police confirmed a report was made and urged the public to avoid speculation as investigations continue. Mr Yeo expressed that he does not wish to cause further trouble. _______________________________________________________ A viral social media post has sparked concern...

Iconic Isetan Outlet at Tampines Mall Shutting Down in November 2025

Department store Isetan will close its Tampines Mall outlet in November 2025, marking the end of a nearly three-decade presence in the heart of Singapore’s East. Isetan Singapore announced the closure on May 6, citing the expiry of its lease and a reassessment of future profitability. The outlet has been a familiar fixture at Tampines Mall since the mall opened in 1996, serving as an anchor tenant for almost 30 years. The company plans to hold a clearance sale closer to the closure date, with more information to be released later. At its peak in 2013, Isetan operated six outlets in Singapore — at Scotts, Wisma Atria, Katong (Parkway Parade), Serangoon Central, Tampines, and Westgate. However, the brand has gradually scaled down its physical footprint. The Katong store was the most recent to shut down in 2022. With the closure of Isetan Tampines, only two outlets wi ll remain — Isetan Scotts and Isetan Serangoon Central. Despite the downsizing, Isetan says it remains com...

Vulgar Taxi Driver Argues With Passenger Over Fare

A video documenting a heated dispute between a taxi driver and his passengers has circulated widely online, sparking significant discussion about service standards and passenger rights. The incident began when the passengers, a man in the front seat and a woman in the back, reached their destination and questioned an unexplained charge on the fare meter. The core of the argument centered on an additional amount listed under the "EXTRA" category on the taxi's payment display. The male passenger sought a clear explanation for this surcharge, suggesting that imposing unaccounted fees could potentially lead to repercussions for the driver's vocational license. The driver, in his defense, stated that since he had not yet collected the payment, he had not actually received the money and therefore could not be accused of overcharging at that point in time. The situation escalated rapidly when the driver proposed going to a police station to settle the matter. When the male...

LAKOPINEWS.COM

Search This Blog