Skip to main content

WP Pritam Singh on Trial Part 8 - Ex WP Admits Urging Raeesah Khan to Lie in Trail


 

On October 21, former Workers’ Party (WP) member Yudhishthra Nathan testified against WP leader Pritam Singh in a trial centered around allegations that Singh misled the Committee of Privileges (COP) regarding a lie told by former WP MP Raeesah Khan in parliament. Nathan, who left the party in 2022 after six years, admitted under cross-examination that he had considered encouraging Khan to maintain her false statement due to the party’s lack of a clear plan for her to come clean.

Khan had falsely claimed in parliament on August 3, 2021, that she accompanied a rape survivor to a police station where the police questioned the victim's attire and alcohol consumption. Although Singh and WP chair Sylvia Lim told her to tell the truth in a meeting on October 12, 2021, Khan only admitted the lie on November 1, 2021, and revealed that she herself was a survivor of sexual assault.

During cross-examination by Singh’s lawyer, Andre Jumabhoy, Nathan acknowledged he was initially in favor of having Khan lie further due to the party's failure to develop a proper plan for addressing the issue. Nathan said he vacillated between wanting Khan to maintain the lie and waiting for WP leaders to devise a solution.

Nathan also testified about a meeting on August 10, 2021, where he claimed Singh made an offensive remark regarding conservative religious men and their views on having an MP who had been raped. Singh’s lawyer accused Nathan of fabricating the comment, pointing out its absence in his previous account to the COP, but Nathan stood by his statement.

Singh faces charges for allegedly lying to the COP about the instructions given to Khan concerning her false statements in parliament.



Labels:
Location: Singapore

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Malaysian Clerk Jailed for Donating Stolen $38K to Douyin Idols

  A 20-year-old Malaysian woman was sentenced to four months’ jail on July 10, 2025, after dishonestly misappropriating more than S$38,000 from her employer, a local recycling firm. The funds were not used for debt repayment as she initially claimed, but instead were donated to Chinese livestreamers on Douyin, the Chinese version of TikTok. Chew Yu En pleaded guilty to one count of dishonest misappropriation as an employee under Singapore law. A second charge for falsifying payment voucher entries was taken into consideration. Chew started working at Sin Le Heng Recycling in June 2024 as a clerk, drawing a monthly salary of S$2,300. She relocated to Singapore from Malaysia on a work permit and lived with her boyfriend in a rented room. Her only close family connection in Singapore was her uncle, a permanent resident. At Sin Le Heng, Chew’s responsibilities included issuing payments to customers who brought in items for recycling. These payments were made from the company's petty ca...
Post a Comment
Read more

HSA Recalls CuraLin Supplement Over Hidden Diabetes Drugs

  The Health Sciences Authority (HSA) has issued a warning to the public not to consume CuraLin Advanced Glucose Support , a supplement marketed for blood sugar control, after it was found to contain undeclared prescription medicines. Tests conducted by HSA on two imported batches revealed the presence of glibenclamide and metformin—both potent antidiabetic drugs that should only be taken under medical supervision. The two affected batches, imported from the United States by LYC Nutrihealth (Singapore) Pte Ltd, are marked as Batch: 2023-19650 and Batch: 2023-19651, both with expiry dates in September 2026. Following these findings, HSA has ordered an immediate sales halt and product recall. The supplement was being sold through local e-commerce platforms including Shopee and Lazada, and claimed to support healthy glucose levels, increase energy, and aid in carbohydrate and fat metabolism. HSA has worked with online marketplace administrators to remove listings of the product. Howev...
Post a Comment
Read more

Nightmare Passenger Pukes and WON'T Compensate!

  A video featuring a sharp disagreement between a private hire vehicle driver and his passengers has become a widely viewed topic on social media, prompting a significant discussion about passenger accountability and operational costs for drivers. The recording shows a couple who appear to be intoxicated involved in a dispute with the driver over an incident that occurred during their trip. The driver states that one of the passengers became sick inside his vehicle, creating a mess that required professional cleaning. Following the completion of the journey, the driver requested a payment of one hundred and fifty dollars from the couple to cover the cleaning fee. The couple immediately rejected this demand. They argued that the amount was ridiculous and unreasonably high for the situation. The driver stood his ground, leading to a tense exchange that was captured in the video. The conflict reached a new level when the passengers declared their intention to file a formal report wit...
Post a Comment
Read more