Skip to main content

Tenant Jailed for Secretly Filming Landlady and her Daughter Over 5 Years

 


A long-term tenant in Singapore was sentenced to 19 months in jail on Dec 30 for secretly filming his landlady and her young daughter over a period of five years. The 40-year-old man, whose name has been redacted under a gag order, pleaded guilty to voyeurism and insulting modesty charges, with other similar offences considered in sentencing.

A Decade of Trust Betrayed

The man had been living with the family for a decade, sharing their home as a tenant. From 2018 to 2023, he filmed the landlady during her showers and her daughter while she changed clothes in the master bedroom. Investigators later uncovered 13 videos of the landlady, 9 videos of her daughter, and 74 screenshots taken from the footage.

The offences began when the girl was three to four years old, and continued into her early primary school years. The tenant filmed them by keeping his door ajar and positioning his phone to capture footage from the master bedroom. His actions escalated over time as he became bolder.

Caught Red-Handed

The tenant was exposed on April 8, 2024, when the landlady discovered him filming her through a gap under the bathroom door as she showered. Startled, she screamed and called her husband, who then contacted the police. The man fled to his room, transferred the footage to another device, and attempted to delete all evidence.

Police arrested him that same day, seizing his electronic devices. A forensic examination revealed the extent of his voyeuristic crimes.

Impact on the Victims

The landlady was deeply shaken upon learning that the tenant had violated her privacy and targeted her daughter. She expressed devastation in a victim impact statement, noting that she had trusted him as a long-time tenant. While her daughter remains unaware of the offences, the family has taken steps to bolster security, including installing CCTV cameras and replacing locks with digital systems.

Court Proceedings

The prosecution sought 21 to 24 months of jail time with caning, emphasizing the daughter’s vulnerability as a young child. However, the judge declined to impose caning, citing the absence of physical violence in the offences.

The defence argued for a reduced sentence, noting that the crimes involved no physical contact and were unsophisticated. Ultimately, the judge sentenced the tenant to 19 months in prison but did not impose caning.

Legal Context

Under Singapore law, voyeurism carries a penalty of up to two years’ jail, along with potential fines and caning. For offences involving children, punishments can be doubled under amalgamated charges. Insulting modesty, an older offence category, carries a maximum penalty of one year in jail or a fine.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Elderly Coffee Shop Patron Suffers Severe Back Pain Following Altercation

  Update: Police have identified a forty-year-old man involved in an incident on August 15 2026 at Roxy Square food court along East Coast Road. Investigations were launched after a seventy-three-year-old man, identified as wonton noodle stall owner Yeo Song Khoon, was shoved to the ground. Mr Yeo, who has difficulty walking, had patted a young girl on the head because he found her adorable. The child's father became upset and confronted him, resulting in the fall. CCTV footage shared online by Bei-Ing Wanton Noodle showed the shove and sparked public appeals. Although the father later apologized and bought Mr Yeo a drink, Mr Yeo began experiencing back pain hours later and is currently managing it with medication. Police confirmed a report was made and urged the public to avoid speculation as investigations continue. Mr Yeo expressed that he does not wish to cause further trouble. _______________________________________________________ A viral social media post has sparked concern...

Iconic Isetan Outlet at Tampines Mall Shutting Down in November 2025

  Department store Isetan will close its Tampines Mall outlet in November 2025, marking the end of a nearly three-decade presence in the heart of Singapore’s East. Isetan Singapore announced the closure on May 6, citing the expiry of its lease and a reassessment of future profitability.  The outlet has been a familiar fixture at Tampines Mall since the mall opened in 1996, serving as an anchor tenant for almost 30 years. The company plans to hold a clearance sale closer to the closure date, with more information to be released later. At its peak in 2013, Isetan operated six outlets in Singapore — at Scotts, Wisma Atria, Katong (Parkway Parade), Serangoon Central, Tampines, and Westgate. However, the brand has gradually scaled down its physical footprint. The Katong store was the most recent to shut down in 2022. With the closure of Isetan Tampines, only two outlets wi ll remain — Isetan Scotts and Isetan Serangoon Central. Despite the downsizing, Isetan says it remains com...

Vulgar Taxi Driver Argues With Passenger Over Fare

  A video documenting a heated dispute between a taxi driver and his passengers has circulated widely online, sparking significant discussion about service standards and passenger rights. The incident began when the passengers, a man in the front seat and a woman in the back, reached their destination and questioned an unexplained charge on the fare meter. The core of the argument centered on an additional amount listed under the "EXTRA" category on the taxi's payment display. The male passenger sought a clear explanation for this surcharge, suggesting that imposing unaccounted fees could potentially lead to repercussions for the driver's vocational license. The driver, in his defense, stated that since he had not yet collected the payment, he had not actually received the money and therefore could not be accused of overcharging at that point in time. The situation escalated rapidly when the driver proposed going to a police station to settle the matter. When the male...