Tenant Jailed for Secretly Filming Landlady and her Daughter Over 5 Years

A long-term tenant in Singapore was sentenced to 19 months in jail on Dec 30 for secretly filming his landlady and her young daughter over a period of five years. The 40-year-old man, whose name has been redacted under a gag order, pleaded guilty to voyeurism and insulting modesty charges, with other similar offences considered in sentencing.

A Decade of Trust Betrayed

The man had been living with the family for a decade, sharing their home as a tenant. From 2018 to 2023, he filmed the landlady during her showers and her daughter while she changed clothes in the master bedroom. Investigators later uncovered 13 videos of the landlady, 9 videos of her daughter, and 74 screenshots taken from the footage.

The offences began when the girl was three to four years old, and continued into her early primary school years. The tenant filmed them by keeping his door ajar and positioning his phone to capture footage from the master bedroom. His actions escalated over time as he became bolder.

Caught Red-Handed

The tenant was exposed on April 8, 2024, when the landlady discovered him filming her through a gap under the bathroom door as she showered. Startled, she screamed and called her husband, who then contacted the police. The man fled to his room, transferred the footage to another device, and attempted to delete all evidence.

Police arrested him that same day, seizing his electronic devices. A forensic examination revealed the extent of his voyeuristic crimes.

Impact on the Victims

The landlady was deeply shaken upon learning that the tenant had violated her privacy and targeted her daughter. She expressed devastation in a victim impact statement, noting that she had trusted him as a long-time tenant. While her daughter remains unaware of the offences, the family has taken steps to bolster security, including installing CCTV cameras and replacing locks with digital systems.

Court Proceedings

The prosecution sought 21 to 24 months of jail time with caning, emphasizing the daughter’s vulnerability as a young child. However, the judge declined to impose caning, citing the absence of physical violence in the offences.

The defence argued for a reduced sentence, noting that the crimes involved no physical contact and were unsophisticated. Ultimately, the judge sentenced the tenant to 19 months in prison but did not impose caning.

Legal Context

Under Singapore law, voyeurism carries a penalty of up to two years’ jail, along with potential fines and caning. For offences involving children, punishments can be doubled under amalgamated charges. Insulting modesty, an older offence category, carries a maximum penalty of one year in jail or a fine.

Comments

Maritime Authority Investigates Ship Collision in Singapore Strait

The Maritime and Port Authority of Singapore has launched an investigation into a maritime collision involving a China-registered fishing vessel and a Panama-registered bulk carrier in the Singapore Strait. The incident occurred on September 17, 2026, and came to public attention after dramatic video footage documenting the collision began circulating online across social media platforms. The Maritime and Port Authority confirmed the details of the incident on September 22, 2026, in response to queries from the media. The two vessels involved in the collision were identified as the Chinese fishing vessel Lu Qing Yuan Yu and the Panamanian bulk carrier First Margaux. Video clips capturing the event showed the moment of impact as the large bulk carrier moved steadily towards the fishing vessel before making direct contact with it. Following the impact, the fishing vessel Lu Qing Yuan Yu began taking on water. However, despite the influx of water, the vessel remained afloat and func...

Bukit Batok Resident Fined After Splashing Waste Outside Neighbour Flat

A 67-year-old Singaporean man named Martin Chua Kim Soon was fined 5,000 dollars by a court on September 22, 2026, after pleading guilty to two counts of insulting behaviour under the Protection from Harassment Act. The court heard that the accused paid the full fine following his conviction. At the time the offences took place, the accused was working as a private-hire driver for Tada and resided at a residential block located along Bukit Batok Central. The incident stemmed from a personal suspicion held by the accused regarding a 73-year-old lorry driver who lived in a neighboring block located directly across from his residence. The private-hire driver harbored a belief that the lorry driver had deliberately punctured his vehicle tyres, leading to a dispute between the two individuals in the same neighborhood. Driven by these suspicions, the accused carried out two separate acts targeting the victim's residence. The first incident occurred on April 28 at approximately 2:00 AM,...

Singapore Introduces Fines Up to Five Thousand Dollars for Public Bus Misconduct

Singapore is introducing new regulations governing commuter conduct on public buses, bus interchanges, and bus terminals, with penalties taking effect on September 23, 2026. The Land Transport Authority announced these new rules following legislative updates aimed at establishing a gracious public transport environment. Under the new framework, bus passengers who engage in disruptive or nuisance behaviors can face fines ranging up to 500 dollars. Specific offenses covered under the 500 dollar maximum fine threshold include playing loud audio, putting feet on seats, littering, and eating or drinking while on board public buses. More severe offenses that impact safety, infrastructure, or cleanliness at bus interchanges, terminals, or on buses carry a significantly higher maximum fine of up to 5,000 dollars. Actions falling under this heavier penalty category include causing an obstruction, endangering other commuters, or soiling any part of a public bus, interchange, or terminal. T...

LAKOPINEWS.COM

Search This Blog