Skip to main content

Tenant Jailed for Secretly Filming Landlady and her Daughter Over 5 Years

 


A long-term tenant in Singapore was sentenced to 19 months in jail on Dec 30 for secretly filming his landlady and her young daughter over a period of five years. The 40-year-old man, whose name has been redacted under a gag order, pleaded guilty to voyeurism and insulting modesty charges, with other similar offences considered in sentencing.

A Decade of Trust Betrayed

The man had been living with the family for a decade, sharing their home as a tenant. From 2018 to 2023, he filmed the landlady during her showers and her daughter while she changed clothes in the master bedroom. Investigators later uncovered 13 videos of the landlady, 9 videos of her daughter, and 74 screenshots taken from the footage.

The offences began when the girl was three to four years old, and continued into her early primary school years. The tenant filmed them by keeping his door ajar and positioning his phone to capture footage from the master bedroom. His actions escalated over time as he became bolder.

Caught Red-Handed

The tenant was exposed on April 8, 2024, when the landlady discovered him filming her through a gap under the bathroom door as she showered. Startled, she screamed and called her husband, who then contacted the police. The man fled to his room, transferred the footage to another device, and attempted to delete all evidence.

Police arrested him that same day, seizing his electronic devices. A forensic examination revealed the extent of his voyeuristic crimes.

Impact on the Victims

The landlady was deeply shaken upon learning that the tenant had violated her privacy and targeted her daughter. She expressed devastation in a victim impact statement, noting that she had trusted him as a long-time tenant. While her daughter remains unaware of the offences, the family has taken steps to bolster security, including installing CCTV cameras and replacing locks with digital systems.

Court Proceedings

The prosecution sought 21 to 24 months of jail time with caning, emphasizing the daughter’s vulnerability as a young child. However, the judge declined to impose caning, citing the absence of physical violence in the offences.

The defence argued for a reduced sentence, noting that the crimes involved no physical contact and were unsophisticated. Ultimately, the judge sentenced the tenant to 19 months in prison but did not impose caning.

Legal Context

Under Singapore law, voyeurism carries a penalty of up to two years’ jail, along with potential fines and caning. For offences involving children, punishments can be doubled under amalgamated charges. Insulting modesty, an older offence category, carries a maximum penalty of one year in jail or a fine.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Malaysian Clerk Jailed for Donating Stolen $38K to Douyin Idols

  A 20-year-old Malaysian woman was sentenced to four months’ jail on July 10, 2025, after dishonestly misappropriating more than S$38,000 from her employer, a local recycling firm. The funds were not used for debt repayment as she initially claimed, but instead were donated to Chinese livestreamers on Douyin, the Chinese version of TikTok. Chew Yu En pleaded guilty to one count of dishonest misappropriation as an employee under Singapore law. A second charge for falsifying payment voucher entries was taken into consideration. Chew started working at Sin Le Heng Recycling in June 2024 as a clerk, drawing a monthly salary of S$2,300. She relocated to Singapore from Malaysia on a work permit and lived with her boyfriend in a rented room. Her only close family connection in Singapore was her uncle, a permanent resident. At Sin Le Heng, Chew’s responsibilities included issuing payments to customers who brought in items for recycling. These payments were made from the company's petty ca...

HSA Recalls CuraLin Supplement Over Hidden Diabetes Drugs

  The Health Sciences Authority (HSA) has issued a warning to the public not to consume CuraLin Advanced Glucose Support , a supplement marketed for blood sugar control, after it was found to contain undeclared prescription medicines. Tests conducted by HSA on two imported batches revealed the presence of glibenclamide and metformin—both potent antidiabetic drugs that should only be taken under medical supervision. The two affected batches, imported from the United States by LYC Nutrihealth (Singapore) Pte Ltd, are marked as Batch: 2023-19650 and Batch: 2023-19651, both with expiry dates in September 2026. Following these findings, HSA has ordered an immediate sales halt and product recall. The supplement was being sold through local e-commerce platforms including Shopee and Lazada, and claimed to support healthy glucose levels, increase energy, and aid in carbohydrate and fat metabolism. HSA has worked with online marketplace administrators to remove listings of the product. Howev...

Nightmare Passenger Pukes and WON'T Compensate!

  A video featuring a sharp disagreement between a private hire vehicle driver and his passengers has become a widely viewed topic on social media, prompting a significant discussion about passenger accountability and operational costs for drivers. The recording shows a couple who appear to be intoxicated involved in a dispute with the driver over an incident that occurred during their trip. The driver states that one of the passengers became sick inside his vehicle, creating a mess that required professional cleaning. Following the completion of the journey, the driver requested a payment of one hundred and fifty dollars from the couple to cover the cleaning fee. The couple immediately rejected this demand. They argued that the amount was ridiculous and unreasonably high for the situation. The driver stood his ground, leading to a tense exchange that was captured in the video. The conflict reached a new level when the passengers declared their intention to file a formal report wit...