Skip to main content

IMH Nurse Jailed for Violating Patient Privacy to Stalk Patient

 



A senior staff nurse at the Institute of Mental Health (IMH), Muhammad Hazrul Sani, was sentenced to one week in jail on January 24 for violating patient privacy under the Computer Misuse Act. Hazrul, 34, accessed a patient’s records through the hospital's system after noticing her Instagram post about an appointment with her psychiatrist.

Hazrul, who had worked at IMH since 2013, admitted to being attracted to the 29-year-old woman and wanting to get to know her. On October 25, 2022, he contacted her on Instagram, mentioning that he recognized the location in her photo as IMH. The next day, he messaged her again, addressing her by her real name—information he retrieved from the hospital's patient system.

Although the woman had not disclosed her real name on Instagram, Hazrul admitted to checking her records but claimed he did not read her file. Despite feeling uncomfortable, the woman initially responded cordially to avoid offending him. Over the next six days, Hazrul sent multiple messages, complimenting her appearance and referencing details from her medical records, including her psychiatrist's advice, prescribed medication, and upcoming appointments.

The situation escalated on October 31, 2022, when Hazrul messaged the woman about her upcoming appointment and suggested meeting after his shift. Uncomfortable with his persistence, the woman blocked him on Instagram. However, Hazrul continued to contact her, using her mobile number—retrieved from the hospital system—to send WhatsApp messages, including birthday wishes.

The woman reported the matter to her psychologist, prompting IMH to launch an internal investigation. It was revealed that Hazrul had accessed her records on nine separate occasions. His access to the patient system was disabled on December 27, 2022, and IMH filed a police report on January 10, 2023. Hazrul was dismissed from his position in March 2023.

In court, Hazrul expressed remorse, explaining that he acted impulsively due to personal issues, including a conflict with his ex-wife. He claimed he had sought comfort by confiding in the woman. However, after being fired, Hazrul messaged the woman again, blaming her for his job loss and stating that "karma" would affect her.

Deputy Public Prosecutor Sunil Nair recommended a fine of $4,000 to $5,000, arguing that Hazrul may have believed the woman did not view her information as private because she acquiesced to his actions and posted publicly about her appointment.

Principal District Judge Lee Lit Cheng disagreed, emphasizing the sensitive nature of psychiatric records, which contain deeply personal details such as family history, relationships, and life experiences. The judge highlighted the societal stigma surrounding mental health and noted that breaches of privacy could discourage patients from seeking help.

Calling Hazrul’s actions a serious breach of trust, Judge Lee sentenced him to one week in jail instead of a fine. The sentence reflects the gravity of violating patient confidentiality, particularly in the mental health sector, where privacy is crucial for fostering trust and encouraging treatment.

Labels:
Location: Singapore

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Elderly Coffee Shop Patron Suffers Severe Back Pain Following Altercation

  Update: Police have identified a forty-year-old man involved in an incident on August 15 2026 at Roxy Square food court along East Coast Road. Investigations were launched after a seventy-three-year-old man, identified as wonton noodle stall owner Yeo Song Khoon, was shoved to the ground. Mr Yeo, who has difficulty walking, had patted a young girl on the head because he found her adorable. The child's father became upset and confronted him, resulting in the fall. CCTV footage shared online by Bei-Ing Wanton Noodle showed the shove and sparked public appeals. Although the father later apologized and bought Mr Yeo a drink, Mr Yeo began experiencing back pain hours later and is currently managing it with medication. Police confirmed a report was made and urged the public to avoid speculation as investigations continue. Mr Yeo expressed that he does not wish to cause further trouble. _______________________________________________________ A viral social media post has sparked concern...
Post a Comment
Read more

Iconic Isetan Outlet at Tampines Mall Shutting Down in November 2025

  Department store Isetan will close its Tampines Mall outlet in November 2025, marking the end of a nearly three-decade presence in the heart of Singapore’s East. Isetan Singapore announced the closure on May 6, citing the expiry of its lease and a reassessment of future profitability.  The outlet has been a familiar fixture at Tampines Mall since the mall opened in 1996, serving as an anchor tenant for almost 30 years. The company plans to hold a clearance sale closer to the closure date, with more information to be released later. At its peak in 2013, Isetan operated six outlets in Singapore — at Scotts, Wisma Atria, Katong (Parkway Parade), Serangoon Central, Tampines, and Westgate. However, the brand has gradually scaled down its physical footprint. The Katong store was the most recent to shut down in 2022. With the closure of Isetan Tampines, only two outlets wi ll remain — Isetan Scotts and Isetan Serangoon Central. Despite the downsizing, Isetan says it remains com...
Post a Comment
Read more

Vulgar Taxi Driver Argues With Passenger Over Fare

  A video documenting a heated dispute between a taxi driver and his passengers has circulated widely online, sparking significant discussion about service standards and passenger rights. The incident began when the passengers, a man in the front seat and a woman in the back, reached their destination and questioned an unexplained charge on the fare meter. The core of the argument centered on an additional amount listed under the "EXTRA" category on the taxi's payment display. The male passenger sought a clear explanation for this surcharge, suggesting that imposing unaccounted fees could potentially lead to repercussions for the driver's vocational license. The driver, in his defense, stated that since he had not yet collected the payment, he had not actually received the money and therefore could not be accused of overcharging at that point in time. The situation escalated rapidly when the driver proposed going to a police station to settle the matter. When the male...
Post a Comment
Read more