Skip to main content

Former Minister S. Iswaran Sentenced to 12 Months for Accepting S$400,000 in Gifts

 


S. Iswaran, former Singapore transport minister, has been sentenced to 12 months in jail after pleading guilty to charges relating to the receipt of over S$403,300 (US$313,200) in gifts from businessmen over a seven-year period. This case, which unfolded in Singapore's High Court, saw Iswaran admit to accepting luxury gifts from Ong Beng Seng, majority shareholder of Singapore GP, and Lum Kok Seng, a construction firm boss. These gifts were received while Iswaran held various high-ranking positions in government, including overseeing portfolios that had official dealings with both businessmen.

The sentencing came after Iswaran chose to plead guilty at the start of trial proceedings, shortening what was expected to be a lengthy trial with 56 prosecution witnesses. Justice Vincent Hoong, who delivered the verdict, stated that he could not align with the sentencing recommendations of either the prosecution or defense. The defense, led by Davinder Singh, sought a maximum sentence of eight weeks, while the prosecution called for six to seven months of imprisonment. Justice Hoong, citing the high level of public interest and the damage caused to public trust, deemed a longer sentence appropriate.

Abuse of Office and Aggravating Factors

Justice Hoong highlighted the abuse of Iswaran’s ministerial position and the deliberate nature of some of his actions, particularly his request for tickets to the 2017 Singapore Formula 1 Grand Prix, valued at S$42,265, and an all-expenses-paid trip to Doha in 2022. These actions were considered deliberate and pointed to a misuse of his government role. Iswaran also acted without transparency, failing to declare the trip and later attempting to cover it up by paying part of the expenses.

While Iswaran’s lawyer argued that his client did not actively seek out the gifts and was unaware of Section 165 of Singapore’s Penal Code, which prohibits public servants from accepting gifts linked to their official duties, the judge rejected these defenses. Hoong concluded that the harm caused to public trust by a minister of Iswaran’s stature required a stronger sentence.

The Timeline and Decision to Plead Guilty

Iswaran’s offences, which spanned from 2015 to 2022, included valuable gifts such as tickets to musical and sporting events, whisky, and a Brompton bicycle. He maintained his innocence for most of the case but pleaded guilty after the prosecution reclassified two corruption charges under Section 165. In total, Iswaran faced five charges: four under Section 165 and one count of obstructing justice for attempting to conceal his trip to Doha.

Iswaran’s guilty plea was accompanied by the consideration of another 30 charges under Section 165. The sentencing framework for Section 165 is rare, with few reported cases in Singapore. Defense lawyer Singh argued that the mere prosecution of Iswaran sent a strong message about the government’s zero-tolerance approach to corruption, while also noting that some gifts, like F1 tickets, had been given without any loss to the providers.

Conclusion and Impact

The case against Iswaran has generated significant public interest, not just because of the high office he once held but also due to the long-lasting impact on public trust. Iswaran resigned from his ministerial duties in January 2024, repaid a significant portion of the illicit gains, and had several luxury items seized. Despite this, the damage to the public’s confidence in government institutions has been substantial.

Iswaran remains on bail pending a potential appeal, and his legal team has until October 7 to make a decision on whether to contest the sentence.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

SCDF Saves 2 Workers Hanging 29 Storeys High on Raffles City Tower!

On 21 July 2025, two workers were rescued from a stuck gondola between the 28th and 29th floors of a building at 250 North Bridge Road (Raffles City Tower) in Singapore. The incident happened around 11:20am, prompting an immediate response from the Singapore Civil Defence Force (SCDF). Upon arriving, firefighters quickly checked the gondola’s stability and ensured the workers’ safety while waiting for the Disaster Assistance and Rescue Team (DART) to deploy. DART operatives secured the gondola using safety lines before one of them descended to the platform. Both workers, who had safety harnesses on, were individually guided through windows on levels 29 and 30. The men were assessed by paramedics and taken to Raffles Hospital in stable condition. Thanks to the fast action by SCDF and DART, a potentially tragic incident was resolved without injuries. The cause of the gondola malfunction remains under review.

Massive Evacuation in Tampines as SCDF Battles Smoke-Filled Apartment Fire

  On the evening of January 9, 2026, a significant residential fire broke out in a Housing Board flat in Tampines, leading to a large-scale emergency response and the hospitalisation of a firefighter. The Singapore Civil Defence Force was alerted to the incident at Block 29 Tampines Street 86 at approximately 9:05pm. The fire originated within a unit located on the 15th floor of the block, creating a hazardous situation for residents and responders alike. Upon the arrival of the emergency teams, the fire was found to be concentrated in one of the bedrooms of the high-rise unit. At the time the blaze broke out, no one was inside the apartment, which meant that there were no civilian injuries reported within the affected home. However, because the unit was locked and heavily smoke-filled, the responding firefighters had to perform a forcible entry to gain access to the seat of the fire. Clad in full protective gear and breathing apparatus, the team entered the hazardous environment t...

Safety Concerns Lead to Putting Down of Large Crocodile in East Coast Park

  A large saltwater crocodile, approximately 3 meters long, was recently spotted near East Coast Park in Singapore, leading to its capture and the decision to put it down due to public safety concerns. The National Parks Board (NParks) cited the risk to public safety and of the crocodile returning to the location where it was captured as a key factor in their decision. In the past, a smaller juvenile crocodile was relocated to the Sungei Buloh Wetland Reserve, but the reserve is no longer a suitable release site due to the increased crocodile population there. NParks advised the public to avoid approaching, provoking, or feeding crocodiles, and to heed warning signs and advisory notices in areas where crocodiles have been sighted. What are your thoughts?