Skip to main content

Former Minister S. Iswaran Sentenced to 12 Months for Accepting S$400,000 in Gifts

 


S. Iswaran, former Singapore transport minister, has been sentenced to 12 months in jail after pleading guilty to charges relating to the receipt of over S$403,300 (US$313,200) in gifts from businessmen over a seven-year period. This case, which unfolded in Singapore's High Court, saw Iswaran admit to accepting luxury gifts from Ong Beng Seng, majority shareholder of Singapore GP, and Lum Kok Seng, a construction firm boss. These gifts were received while Iswaran held various high-ranking positions in government, including overseeing portfolios that had official dealings with both businessmen.

The sentencing came after Iswaran chose to plead guilty at the start of trial proceedings, shortening what was expected to be a lengthy trial with 56 prosecution witnesses. Justice Vincent Hoong, who delivered the verdict, stated that he could not align with the sentencing recommendations of either the prosecution or defense. The defense, led by Davinder Singh, sought a maximum sentence of eight weeks, while the prosecution called for six to seven months of imprisonment. Justice Hoong, citing the high level of public interest and the damage caused to public trust, deemed a longer sentence appropriate.

Abuse of Office and Aggravating Factors

Justice Hoong highlighted the abuse of Iswaran’s ministerial position and the deliberate nature of some of his actions, particularly his request for tickets to the 2017 Singapore Formula 1 Grand Prix, valued at S$42,265, and an all-expenses-paid trip to Doha in 2022. These actions were considered deliberate and pointed to a misuse of his government role. Iswaran also acted without transparency, failing to declare the trip and later attempting to cover it up by paying part of the expenses.

While Iswaran’s lawyer argued that his client did not actively seek out the gifts and was unaware of Section 165 of Singapore’s Penal Code, which prohibits public servants from accepting gifts linked to their official duties, the judge rejected these defenses. Hoong concluded that the harm caused to public trust by a minister of Iswaran’s stature required a stronger sentence.

The Timeline and Decision to Plead Guilty

Iswaran’s offences, which spanned from 2015 to 2022, included valuable gifts such as tickets to musical and sporting events, whisky, and a Brompton bicycle. He maintained his innocence for most of the case but pleaded guilty after the prosecution reclassified two corruption charges under Section 165. In total, Iswaran faced five charges: four under Section 165 and one count of obstructing justice for attempting to conceal his trip to Doha.

Iswaran’s guilty plea was accompanied by the consideration of another 30 charges under Section 165. The sentencing framework for Section 165 is rare, with few reported cases in Singapore. Defense lawyer Singh argued that the mere prosecution of Iswaran sent a strong message about the government’s zero-tolerance approach to corruption, while also noting that some gifts, like F1 tickets, had been given without any loss to the providers.

Conclusion and Impact

The case against Iswaran has generated significant public interest, not just because of the high office he once held but also due to the long-lasting impact on public trust. Iswaran resigned from his ministerial duties in January 2024, repaid a significant portion of the illicit gains, and had several luxury items seized. Despite this, the damage to the public’s confidence in government institutions has been substantial.

Iswaran remains on bail pending a potential appeal, and his legal team has until October 7 to make a decision on whether to contest the sentence.



Labels:
Location: Singapore

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Vulgar Taxi Driver Argues With Passenger Over Fare

  A video documenting a heated dispute between a taxi driver and his passengers has circulated widely online, sparking significant discussion about service standards and passenger rights. The incident began when the passengers, a man in the front seat and a woman in the back, reached their destination and questioned an unexplained charge on the fare meter. The core of the argument centered on an additional amount listed under the "EXTRA" category on the taxi's payment display. The male passenger sought a clear explanation for this surcharge, suggesting that imposing unaccounted fees could potentially lead to repercussions for the driver's vocational license. The driver, in his defense, stated that since he had not yet collected the payment, he had not actually received the money and therefore could not be accused of overcharging at that point in time. The situation escalated rapidly when the driver proposed going to a police station to settle the matter. When the male...
Post a Comment
Read more

Viral Police Report Accuses Tan Tock Seng Hospital of Unlawful Restraint

  A serious allegation against Tan Tock Seng Hospital has emerged online through a viral social media post by Olivia Tang on October 19th, 2025. The post contained an image of a formal police report filed regarding an incident that allegedly occurred at the hospital on October 10th, 2025. According to the police report shared by Tang, the situation unfolded when she was reportedly subjected to what she describes as a forcible medical procedure one day before her scheduled discharge from the hospital. She alleges that a doctor directed approximately ten hospital staff members and AETOS security officers to physically restrain her. In her account, her hospital gown was torn open, and she was administered an injection containing an unknown substance without her explicit consent. The justification provided for this action, according to Tang's police report, was that she was deemed to be of unsound mind under the Mental Health Act. This classification allegedly resulted in her being den...
Post a Comment
Read more

Marine Terrace Feud Turns Physical in New Video

  The ongoing neighbor dispute at Block 53 Marine Terrace has escalated further with the release of new video footage on October 18th. Madam Poh shared the visual evidence showing a physical confrontation with her neighbors, accompanied by a caption alleging violent behavior following their recent court case loss. The video footage, which lacks audio content, depicts a couple who are Madam Poh's neighbors engaged in what appears to be a tense argument with the individuals recording. In the sequence of events, the female neighbor is seen retreating toward their residence while the male neighbor advances toward Madam Poh and the camera operator. The situation intensifies as the man confronts them directly before striking the recording device, causing it to fall to the ground. This incident occurs in the context of the recent legal ruling from the Community Disputes Resolution Tribunals, which found in favor of Madam Poh and her family. The court had ordered the neighbors to pay $345 ...
Post a Comment
Read more