In Singapore, a 50-year-old married man received a 21-week jail sentence after being convicted of voyeurism and possessing manipulated videos meant to humiliate his wife's niece. The offender, whose name is withheld under a gag order protecting the victim’s identity, pleaded guilty to these charges. The incident involved him secretly recording the 23-year-old woman in private settings and later using his design skills to superimpose her face onto explicit videos.
The man had been married since 2017 and lived with his wife and her niece, who had moved in with them in 2006 to pursue her studies. After buying an apartment in 2019, the offender’s marriage became strained, leading to frequent arguments. According to the court, he acted out of "frustration," becoming “curious” about the niece’s activities in the bathroom.
Between May and July 2022, he placed a hidden camera in the woman’s bathroom on three occasions, capturing her in private acts, such as applying lotion and changing clothes. In early July, he upgraded his equipment to a Wi-Fi-enabled camera, allowing him to view recordings on his smartphone. Over the next few days, he positioned the device multiple times in her bathroom, capturing images of her showering and undressing. He also hid the camera under her bed while pretending to vacuum her room.
The woman discovered the first camera taped beneath her sink on July 12, 2022, and immediately informed her aunt and the police. She also found a second camera under her bed while moving out that same day, turning it over to law enforcement. A forensic search of the offender’s electronic devices uncovered 17 videos with explicit content. The man admitted he had superimposed the niece’s face onto pornographic material using a smartphone app, which the prosecution argued was a severe invasion of privacy. While he did not attempt to distribute the recordings, the prosecutor noted the risk of the material being leaked.
The prosecution sought a jail term of 24 to 29 weeks, emphasizing the betrayal of trust, given that the man had known the victim since she was a teenager. The prosecutor pointed to the risk of harm to the victim, though she was reportedly unaware of the doctored videos and had not suffered direct emotional harm from them. The offender’s lawyers, Tang Shangwei and Warren Tian, argued for a reduced sentence of 15 weeks, describing the offender as “deeply ashamed and remorseful.” They attributed his actions to an adjustment disorder with depressed mood stemming from multiple personal stressors, including marital difficulties and financial strain.
The defense presented a psychiatric report detailing that the offender’s emotional issues had led to excessive alcohol consumption and increased pornography use as coping mechanisms. The offender admitted that his actions provided him a “sense of control” following disputes with his wife. Chief Justice Sundaresh Menon sentenced him to 21 weeks’ jail, starting November 15, acknowledging the psychological factors involved but upholding the sentence as appropriate for the severity of the crime.
The case has stirred conversations around privacy and the lengths to which technology can exacerbate breaches of trust. Given that the manipulated videos remained private, the offender’s sentence serves as both punishment and deterrent against similar actions that might exploit close relationships. This case underscores the risks of digital tools in facilitating boundary violations and the responsibility of the legal system to maintain the victim’s dignity.
Comments
Post a Comment