Skip to main content

Two Arrested for Loanshark Harassment at Rivervale Drive

 


Credit: Singapore Police Force

Two individuals were arrested by the police on Dec. 25 and 26, 2024, for their alleged involvement in separate loanshark harassment cases at the same residential unit along Rivervale Drive.



Arrests

The first incident occurred on Christmas Day at approximately 9:50 p.m. A 38-year-old man, suspected of working for an unlicensed moneylender, was apprehended outside a residential unit. Police officers found him with a black marker and two cans of red paint, items commonly used in harassment activities.



Just a few hours later, on Dec. 26 at about 12:20 a.m., a second individual—a 31-year-old woman—was arrested at the same location under similar circumstances. She was also found carrying a black marker and red paint cans.



Separate Offenders, Similar Methods

Investigations revealed that the man and woman were not connected but had separately responded to Facebook job advertisements promising quick cash. Both individuals claimed they had not received the promised payment.



Legal Consequences

Both suspects face charges under the Moneylenders Act 2008 and will be presented in court on Dec. 27.

Penalties for loanshark harassment include:

  • A fine ranging from $5,000 to $50,000.
  • Imprisonment of up to five years.
  • Up to six strokes of the cane for first-time offenders.

Police Statement

The police reiterated their zero-tolerance stance toward loanshark harassment, emphasizing that those involved in vandalizing property or disturbing public peace would face strict legal action.

Public Advisory

Members of the public are urged to avoid interacting with loansharks or assisting them. Suspicious activities can be reported to the police via the emergency hotline, 999.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Singapore NSF Found Unconscious at Pasir Laba Camp, Pronounced Dead in Hospital

  A full-time national serviceman (NSF) from the Singapore Armed Forces (SAF) was found unconscious and unresponsive at Pasir Laba Camp on Friday evening.  The Ministry of Defence (MINDEF) and Singapore Police Force (SPF) confirmed that the NSF was evacuated to Ng Teng Fong General Hospital by the SAF Ambulance Service but was pronounced dead despite resuscitation efforts.  MINDEF and SPF clarified that the incident is not training-related, and preliminary investigations do not suggest foul play.  The case has been classified as an unnatural death, with investigations ongoing. MINDEF and the SAF expressed their condolences to the serviceman's family and are providing support during this time of grief. Rest in Peace.

Marine Terrace Feud Turns Physical in New Video

  The ongoing neighbor dispute at Block 53 Marine Terrace has escalated further with the release of new video footage on October 18th. Madam Poh shared the visual evidence showing a physical confrontation with her neighbors, accompanied by a caption alleging violent behavior following their recent court case loss. The video footage, which lacks audio content, depicts a couple who are Madam Poh's neighbors engaged in what appears to be a tense argument with the individuals recording. In the sequence of events, the female neighbor is seen retreating toward their residence while the male neighbor advances toward Madam Poh and the camera operator. The situation intensifies as the man confronts them directly before striking the recording device, causing it to fall to the ground. This incident occurs in the context of the recent legal ruling from the Community Disputes Resolution Tribunals, which found in favor of Madam Poh and her family. The court had ordered the neighbors to pay $345 ...

Nightmare Passenger Pukes and WON'T Compensate!

  A video featuring a sharp disagreement between a private hire vehicle driver and his passengers has become a widely viewed topic on social media, prompting a significant discussion about passenger accountability and operational costs for drivers. The recording shows a couple who appear to be intoxicated involved in a dispute with the driver over an incident that occurred during their trip. The driver states that one of the passengers became sick inside his vehicle, creating a mess that required professional cleaning. Following the completion of the journey, the driver requested a payment of one hundred and fifty dollars from the couple to cover the cleaning fee. The couple immediately rejected this demand. They argued that the amount was ridiculous and unreasonably high for the situation. The driver stood his ground, leading to a tense exchange that was captured in the video. The conflict reached a new level when the passengers declared their intention to file a formal report wit...