Skip to main content

Political Party Broadcast: Progress Singapore Party (PSP)

 




On April 25, 2025, Progress Singapore Party (PSP) founder and chairman Dr Tan Cheng Bock delivered a passionate call for a more balanced and representative parliament during the party’s political broadcast ahead of the General Election.

Dr Tan said the PSP is ready to serve as a loyal opposition, offering constructive policy alternatives that reflect the needs of everyday Singaporeans. Citing the work of former Non-Constituency Members of Parliament (NCMPs) Leong Mun Wai and Hazel Poa in the 14th Parliament, he said the party now seeks to continue that work as elected MPs in the 15th Parliament.

Dr Tan, together with Mr Leong and Ms Poa, will contest in the newly formed West Coast-Jurong West GRC—considered PSP’s A-team. Other PSP candidates are fielded in Chua Chu Kang GRC, as well as in four Single Member Constituencies: Kebun Baru, Marymount, Pioneer and Bukit Gombak. In total, the party is contesting 13 seats in this election.

In his roughly four-minute speech, Dr Tan described the significant economic and geopolitical challenges facing Singapore. He warned of a rapidly changing global environment where free trade—the lifeblood of Singapore’s economy—is under threat due to rising protectionism and shifts in global power structures. He also highlighted domestic changes, including the disruption of traditional job markets caused by artificial intelligence and the rise of gig work.

Dr Tan cautioned that the ruling party’s newer candidates increasingly come from the civil service or military, and are often placed into safe Group Representation Constituencies (GRCs). “Do you want a parliament made up of a small group of elites that engages in groupthink?” he asked. “Will that be enough to help us chart our way through the challenges that we are about to face?”

He argued that a more diverse and balanced parliament—one that includes views beyond the government’s—is crucial for Singapore’s long-term stability and growth. “What we need is a more balanced parliament that represents the diverse views of Singaporeans,” he said.

Acknowledging that PSP is only fielding 13 candidates, Dr Tan was frank that forming a government was not the party’s objective in this election. However, he stressed that if elected, PSP MPs will “speak up fearlessly” and push for policy changes that can improve Singaporeans’ lives.

He highlighted the party’s manifesto, which contains 61 policy proposals covering key issues such as the cost of living, housing, healthcare, jobs, and wages. According to Dr Tan, these proposals are built on the belief that progress must be inclusive and benefit all Singaporeans—not just a privileged elite. “Progress should not only benefit an elite class at the top. No one should be left behind,” he said.

The party’s campaign slogan, “Progress For All”, reflects this vision. Dr Tan said that Singapore’s economic and social development must serve everyone, and warned against leaving segments of the population behind in the pursuit of growth.

He praised PSP’s slate of candidates, describing them as well-qualified individuals with strong moral conviction and a deep desire to serve the country. “They are loyal Singaporeans who love Singapore and want the best for our country,” he said.

Dr Tan added that the decision to enter politics was not taken lightly by his team. “They could have chosen the easier path of staying out of politics altogether,” he noted. “But these men and women are brave. They have put themselves forward to serve Singaporeans and be your voice in parliament.”

He concluded by reinforcing PSP’s commitment to shaping Singapore’s future through open debate and diverse representation. “We are here to help the government find the best way forward for Singapore,” he said. “This is what a loyal opposition does.”

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Singapore NSF Found Unconscious at Pasir Laba Camp, Pronounced Dead in Hospital

  A full-time national serviceman (NSF) from the Singapore Armed Forces (SAF) was found unconscious and unresponsive at Pasir Laba Camp on Friday evening.  The Ministry of Defence (MINDEF) and Singapore Police Force (SPF) confirmed that the NSF was evacuated to Ng Teng Fong General Hospital by the SAF Ambulance Service but was pronounced dead despite resuscitation efforts.  MINDEF and SPF clarified that the incident is not training-related, and preliminary investigations do not suggest foul play.  The case has been classified as an unnatural death, with investigations ongoing. MINDEF and the SAF expressed their condolences to the serviceman's family and are providing support during this time of grief. Rest in Peace.

Marine Terrace Feud Turns Physical in New Video

  The ongoing neighbor dispute at Block 53 Marine Terrace has escalated further with the release of new video footage on October 18th. Madam Poh shared the visual evidence showing a physical confrontation with her neighbors, accompanied by a caption alleging violent behavior following their recent court case loss. The video footage, which lacks audio content, depicts a couple who are Madam Poh's neighbors engaged in what appears to be a tense argument with the individuals recording. In the sequence of events, the female neighbor is seen retreating toward their residence while the male neighbor advances toward Madam Poh and the camera operator. The situation intensifies as the man confronts them directly before striking the recording device, causing it to fall to the ground. This incident occurs in the context of the recent legal ruling from the Community Disputes Resolution Tribunals, which found in favor of Madam Poh and her family. The court had ordered the neighbors to pay $345 ...

Nightmare Passenger Pukes and WON'T Compensate!

  A video featuring a sharp disagreement between a private hire vehicle driver and his passengers has become a widely viewed topic on social media, prompting a significant discussion about passenger accountability and operational costs for drivers. The recording shows a couple who appear to be intoxicated involved in a dispute with the driver over an incident that occurred during their trip. The driver states that one of the passengers became sick inside his vehicle, creating a mess that required professional cleaning. Following the completion of the journey, the driver requested a payment of one hundred and fifty dollars from the couple to cover the cleaning fee. The couple immediately rejected this demand. They argued that the amount was ridiculous and unreasonably high for the situation. The driver stood his ground, leading to a tense exchange that was captured in the video. The conflict reached a new level when the passengers declared their intention to file a formal report wit...